Key
Points
- Kirstin Lobato was not in Las Vegas when Duran Bailey
was murdered.
- She was not in a "drug induced haze" (as the
prosecutor claimed) during the time of his murder. Laboratory blood tests
from July prove this.
- No physical evidence was found at the scene of the crime
that was in any way linked to Kirstin. There was physical evidence found
at the crime scene, which an expert witness told the newspapers was "exclusionary
on her behalf."
- Her "confession" was not about the murder of
Duran Bailey. It was about what happened during an attempted rape perpetrated
by a different man 6 weeks prior to his murder.
- The police did not pursue leads stemming from the woman
Duran Bailey raped the week before he was found murdered.
- Blood spatter evidence shows that it would have been physically
impossible for Kirstin, at 5'7", 125 lbs, to have been capable of
providing the kind of brute force that was evident at the scene of the
crime.
To Next Page of Key Points
|